DSB doubts

DSB final report doubts: no mentioning of vertical limits Rostov radar

June 6, 2016 // 1 Comment

by DSB used the ‘at the glass’ recording of the primary radar of Rostov (Russia) to determine that no other aircraft besides three civil airliners were in the vicinity of MH17. At the [...]

DSB final report doubts: no bow-tie shaped damage on outer skin

April 18, 2016 // 76 Comments

by DSB concluded the missile that downed MH17 was a 9N314M. This was based on the three fragments found on cockpit and bodies of cockpit crew. It would be logical to assume not only bow-tie shaped [...]

Overview of all doubts on DSB final report

April 18, 2016 // 54 Comments

by This post is a landing page for all posts published on this website about doubts on the DSB final report. DSB final report doubts: no bow-tie shaped damage on outer skin DSB final report doubts: [...]

DSB final report doubts: no drift angle

April 18, 2016 // 12 Comments

by In determining the location where the missile exploded plus determining the angle of the missile relative to the aircraft it is important to understand the position of the aircraft relative to [...]

DSB final report doubts: location of explosion

April 16, 2016 // 16 Comments

by DSB calculated the location of the explosion as: X=0 Y=-2.0 meter Z= 3,7 meters That means the missile exploded exactly two meters left of the nose and 3,7 meter above the nose. This position [...]

DSB final report doubts: does a 9N314M warhead fit on 9M38 missile ?

April 14, 2016 // 24 Comments

by DSB states in their final report that a 9N314M warhead can be fitted to a 9M38 missile and on a 9M38M1 missile. However, Almaz Antey states the 9N314M missile can only be fitted on a 9M38M1 [...]