Indictment in MH17 air crash expected this summer, says Dutch diplomat
Dutch Ambassador to Ukraine Kees Klompenhouwer has stated that there will be an indictment in the MH17 air crash in summer 2016. This is reported by press in Ukraine.
In 2015 Klompenhouwer had said that an indictment was expected in October/November 2015.
Dutch Ambassador to Ukraine Kees Klompenhouwer says: Indictment in MH17 air crash is expected this fall. He expressed his hope that after a technical report is published, around October-November, the Dutch Attorney General will issue an indictment. The report itself will be purely technical, it will not answer who did it – that answer will be provided by the attorney general’s indictment.
What the hell has someone in Ukraine to decide about our victims? Is that Attorney General a Ukrainian? Are they mad in the Netherlands?
And what might that technical report be? Metallurgical research on shrapnel? Hopefully done by the last independent research institute in Europe without ties with the European Union. Maybe Switzerland, as the last nation state with an independent parliament. Otherwise research might easily be corrupted.
What can they know, we do not? They do not have more technical information about the wreckage. The metallurgical research on the bowties is a mess; it is done with the naked eye looking through some pipe with glass. They have no figures, no hard evidence and what they had we already falsified.
They found traces of aluminum? Fine, but then they first must prove this Boeing 777 has aluminum different from other planes. The same for zirconium, the same for paint on alleged rocket parts.
And how did those objects came into the wreckage? It is hopeless. In this criminal investigation everything must have gone through the hull or through the windshields. Without proof of conditional probabilities > 0 the judges must wipe all alleged evidence away.
Klompenhouwer says: The criminal inquiry conducted by the Dutch, together with their four partners, has been a success: a lot of information has been gathered and is now being processed. Well this looks as a social science survey on witnesses.
Physical evidence is what we are interested in on this site. Psychological evidence is second hand evidence, derived from physical evidence. Physical evidence is main evidence and psychological evidence might be circumstantial evidence.
Up to now there is no convincing physical evidence for 9N314M what has been argued in length on this site. Hence it also can turn out to be 9N314 or another weapon.
But what would you do if you have no convincing physical evidence? Of course you would inflate psychological evidence disproportionately. So JIT probably will come with piles of social sciences surveys on witnesses to blow the judges away. They will come with a lot of negative stories about the criminal suspects.
The first thing they will try is to convince the judges physical evidence is not that important and the focus must be on social science surveys of witnesses and gathered information from the SBU about possible perpetrators. If judges are accord all wreckage will be wiped from the table and only two falsified bow ties and two squares will be left.
So lawyers are already warned for the strategy of JIT: strangling the defense by an overflow of disinformation.